UWB vs BLE Beacons for indoor location

Ultra-wideband (UWB) technology and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons are two commonly used technologies for indoor location tracking. Both technologies have their own unique benefits and drawbacks, depending on the specific use case. In this article, we will compare UWB and BLE in terms of their suitability for indoor location tracking, and discuss the benefits of UWB over BLE.


What is UWB technology?

Ultra-wideband (UWB) technology is a wireless communication technology that uses a very wide frequency range to transmit data. UWB occupies a large portion of the radio frequency spectrum, typically ranging from 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz. It is characterized by its ability to transmit a high amount of data over a short distance, with very low power consumption.

UWB has several unique properties that make it well-suited for certain types of applications. One of the key benefits of UWB is its high precision and accuracy when it comes to location tracking. Because UWB can transmit a high amount of data, it can be used to accurately determine the location of objects or people within a few centimeters. This makes UWB particularly useful for applications where precise location information is critical.UWB technology is used in a variety of applications, including indoor location tracking, wireless communication, and radar systems. It is also being explored for use in the Internet of Things (IoT) and in 5G communication systems.

What are BLE Beacons?

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons are small, low-cost devices that use Bluetooth technology to transmit a signal to nearby devices. These devices are often used for indoor location tracking and proximity marketing.

BLE beacons work by continuously transmitting a Bluetooth signal that can be detected by other Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as smartphones or tablets. When a device comes within range of a beacon, it can receive the beacon’s signal and determine its location based on the strength of the signal. This allows the device to accurately track its location within a few meters.

BLE beacons are often used in retail environments to provide location-based information to customers. For example, a retail store might use BLE beacons to send special offers or coupons to customers’ smartphones as they walk by certain products. BLE beacons can also be used in museums or other public spaces to provide location-based audio or video content to visitors.

Comparison between UWB and BLE Beacons

One major benefit of UWB over BLE is its precision and accuracy. UWB uses a very wide frequency range and can transmit a high amount of data, allowing for more precise location tracking. This makes UWB particularly well-suited for applications that require high accuracy, such as in hospitals or warehouses where precise location information is critical. In contrast, BLE relies on radio waves and has a lower data transmission rate, leading to lower precision and accuracy.

Another benefit of UWB is its longer range. UWB can transmit signals over a longer distance compared to BLE, making it suitable for use in large indoor spaces such as warehouses or factories. This allows UWB to track the location of objects or people over a larger area, whereas BLE may be limited to tracking within a smaller range.

In addition to its precision and range, UWB has several other benefits that make it suitable for indoor location tracking. UWB signals can pass through solid objects such as walls and floors, making it possible to track the location of objects or people even when they are hidden from view. This is not possible with BLE, which relies on line-of-sight communication. UWB is also resistant to interference from other wireless signals, making it more reliable for location tracking in environments with a high density of wireless devices.

Despite these benefits, there are some drawbacks to using UWB for indoor location tracking. One major drawback is its cost. UWB technology is generally more expensive to implement compared to BLE, making it less accessible for smaller businesses or organizations. UWB also requires more complex infrastructure and hardware to support it, which can increase the cost and complexity of deployment.

BLE, on the other hand, has some advantages over UWB. One major advantage is its energy efficiency. BLE is designed to consume very little power, making it suitable for use in devices that require long battery life. This makes BLE well-suited for applications where frequent battery replacement is not practical, such as in wearable devices or in devices that are difficult to access for maintenance.BLE is also easier to implement and has a lower cost compared to UWB, making it more accessible for smaller businesses or organizations. BLE devices can be quickly and easily set up using a smartphone or other Bluetooth-enabled device, and the technology is widely supported by a range of consumer devices.


In summary, UWB technology offers a number of benefits for indoor location tracking, including high precision and accuracy, a longer range, and the ability to pass through solid objects. However, UWB is generally more expensive to implement and requires more complex infrastructure compared to BLE. BLE has the advantage of being more energy efficient and less expensive to implement, but its lower precision and range may not be suitable for all indoor location tracking applications. The choice between UWB and BLE will depend on the specific needs and constraints of the application.

Get in touch with our sales team to discuss your project and find out which technology is best suited for your needs. Our team will be happy to assist you in finding the right solution.

Don’t hesitate to contact us today!

Back to top